I wear vintage fur, and this shoot probably borrow already dead animals, but its different when one sees animals that are near extinction in a shoot with highly priced garments.
The models were also wearing fur. Disturbing!
Apparently the clothing was inspired by "This isn't about Marilyn Monroe moving to India and having an acid trip" I didnt catch any of that feeling!
What is the point of such a shoot?!
Many of the animals are leashed and being dominated by the models. Is this saying that animals are under our charge and can be converted into tiger shawls and hats?
If they were trying to make a statement why not put a tiger in the same shots as its brother who was made into a garment?! Yes the fur is real.
Why not use a real bunny and fake fur?
SIGH
No comments:
Post a Comment